The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The maps compare the differences between the waterfront area at a town called Darwin in 2009 and itself half a decade later.
Generally, there hadn't been any remarkable changes over 5 years apart from the clearance of the industrial area to make way for more trees, residential buildings, recreational venue as well as an academic building and a new pathway. There was also the presence of a new harbour right next to the new path.
Over half a decade, both of the industrial areas were cleared out. The afterward empty area situated at the south of the footpath, in 5 years time, was taken over by an additional of three residential buildings, a university and trees. Another swimming pool was also constructed in replacement of the other former industrial area. A new footpath came to existence between the roles of trees. To the East of the path, a new harbour was established. There wasn't any movement nor was there renovation occurred to the two old swimming pool, the school and the convention centre. The fishing area was also remained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...alf a decade later. Generally, there hadnt been any remarkable changes over 5 year...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...h, a new harbour was established. There wasnt any movement nor was there renovation o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re. The fishing area was also remained.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, apart from, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88826815642 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7506010817 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581005586592 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.4661639576 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185908231011 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752728405967 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11611643244 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181070167643 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164928437913 0.0819641961636 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.