The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present

The map depicts a host of modernization taking place in Ryemouth village from 1995 to the present day.

Overall, Ryemouth has witnessed significant changes, prominent of which is the deforestation in the eastern part of the village as well as the erection of new recreational accommodations. Notwithstanding several modifications that have been done to the village; the housing area stayed unchanged throughout the years.

As per the map, the road has been expanded, directly connected to the main road. Adjacent to this newly built route is the houses which aligned themselves with the rectangular-shaped road wrapping around a smaller housing area. Another major modification is the loss of farmland, which was done with a view to providing space for a new golf and tennis sporting complex. In addition, to the southeast, there has not been any prominent refurbishment made to the hotel. However, a car park has been constructed next to the aforementioned accomodation.

What is more, the shopping establishments and the fish market has been demolished to make way for new eateries and apartments, respectively. Additionally, the village has also had its fishing port removed. Nevertheless, the café near the former fish market has not been developed since 1995.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, as well as, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1079.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.395 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3510259623 2.65546596893 126% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4862329259 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0909090909 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15652527005 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590170342282 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925452719991 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123486998384 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116477245519 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.