The map below is of the town of Garlsdon and two possible sites for a new supermarket.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is one map illustrating the two possible sites for a new supermarket of the town Garlsdon.
From an overall perspective, neither site of supermarket is appropriate for all the towns, but for Hindon, Cransdon and Garlsdon, the out of town site(S1) would probably offer more adventages.
In the northwest of Garlsdon is site S1, which just stand nearby the main roads straight for Hindon with no more than 12 kilometers, so it will be convenient for customers from Hindon go shopping with a car, It would not be a problem that parking car near the supermarket, since S1 locate in the countryside that provider the sufficient parking space, Moreover, there is a railway across the centre of Garsldon link Hindon to Cransdon. So it would be suitable for travels who would like go shopping by trains.
In the centre of Garlsdon is site S2, which surround by a lot of local houses and insulate the industry in the south, so it would not suffer noise affection. Benefiting of its centre location, S2 site offer more convenience for customers from Bransdon and Cransdon, where locate in the southwest and southeast of Garlsdon respectively. Customers from Bransdon driving approximately 16 kilometers could arrive to S2 supermarket. While Customers from Cransdon have a wider choices, they could drive a car or take a train. However, S2 site have limited parking space due to the centre town location.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98723404255 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84944380776 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 107.879562476 43.030603864 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 130.222222222 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213354550789 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108511903468 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118771915552 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191899631476 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134506474075 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.