The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The map of the Garlsdon town illustrates the two possible locations for the future supermarket.

The town consists of four parts: center, industry, housing, and countryside. The first site is located on the North-west, in a 12 km to Hindon place. This supermarket could be built in the largest part - the countryside of the town, between the railway and one of the main roads, leaving behind housing, industry zone, and the center of the city. The second place is planned to be right in the center of Gralsdon, a quite quiet place, as the heart of the city has no traffic zone indicated. This supermarket could be very close to the crossroads of three main roads and locate to the south of the railway, however, the city center is the smallest zone of Garlsdon and due to the location, the supermarket can be very far away from Brandson and Cransdon city.

Overall, according to the given map, the first site of the future supermarket seems more suitable, than the second one because of the space the shop is planned to be built. The countryside is wider that center, and much closer to the neighbor city. Moreover, this site has transport facilities for people to get there.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...er, industry, housing, and countryside. The first site is located on the North-west...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7427184466 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58914664821 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538834951456 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0859896248 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24136857741 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109114629961 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123613146991 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237050599534 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143062545414 0.0819641961636 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.