The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given map illustrates the valley of Garlsdon and planning to construct two new supermarkets. Overall, it is obvious that location of Glarlson is covered in the centre by the country side.

Admittedly, it is noticeable that the first supermarket prefers to build up in the north-west direction at the countryside. Moreover, what is remarkable is the second Supermarket is more likely to add in the city of Hindon, where its population about 10,000 and 12 km destination from Garlson. Furthermore, the second supermarket will be in the middle of housing and industry in the north-south and west-east side respectively, where there will be no sign of traffic zone.

In an additional, it is worth to mention that there will be the railway facilities to travel from the first supermarket and across to the second supermarket at the east south direction. Likewise, there is also the main road in order to make a track from the town of Brandon where its citizens includes about 15,000 and then it reach at the area of Cransdon with having 29,000 of the residents.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ket and across to the second supermarket at the east south direction. Likewise, t...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reaches'?
Suggestion: reaches
...izens includes about 15,000 and then it reach at the area of Cransdon with having 29,...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, likewise, moreover, second, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93888888889 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94632539502 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2064894904 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177260317734 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772066883412 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573424872202 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116717687739 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212091797038 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.