Map of a City Hospital
The maps illustrate the changes made in the city hospitals transportation infrastructure between 2007 and 2010. Overall, the major charges happened in the infrastructure were addition of new bus station, restructuring of parking areas and addition of two new roundabouts.
Looking into the maps in more details, the bus stops presented on the either side of the hospital road in 2005 were no longer existed in 2010. There was no major changes in the roads( hospital road, ring road and city road, though two new roundabouts were added in the new architecture; one was at the intersection of city road and hospital road, while the other one was at the opposite side of the hospital road, at the intersection of ring road and hospital road.
A new bus station is built to the west of the hospital road, and it can be accessed by to small link roads connecting both roundabouts. The final major changes were made on parking area. Initially, there was only one parking area to the east of the hospital road that can be accessed from ring road, and shared by both staff and public. However, in 2010, while a new car parking area is built to the east of the hospital for public vehicles that can be accessed from ring road, the old parking area was allotted only to the staffs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hospitals'' or 'hospital's'?
Suggestion: hospitals'; hospital's
...illustrate the changes made in the city hospitals transportation infrastructure between 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...2010. There was no major changes in the roads hospital road, ring road and city road,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69333333333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65149014707 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422222222222 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.975916404 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.0 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.125 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234866599612 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120071714681 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123308704634 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17912067388 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720177400299 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.