The two maps describe how a small town named Islip is planned to change in comparison with its current layout.
According to the plan for its development, this centre’s layout will change dramatically. More amenities will be constructed and the transport system is planned to be upgraded.
Currently, this centre has a main road running form west to east, with two short lanes down to the south, one of which leads to a school and another leads to a park. Between those two lanes, there are two ranges of shops along both sides of the road and residential areas in the south and a countryside area far in the north.
The plan is to totally change its layout into a circle area for pedestrians only, which will be covered by a dual carriageway. Therefore, the countryside and the row of shops in the north will be eradicated, but the row of shops in its southern side will remain intact. The other side of the old road will witness the construction of a bus station, a shopping centre and a car park respectively from west to east. The school will remain unchanged outside the circle but a park is planned to be relocated inside the pedestrian area. Beside some residential areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right of the car park and another on the left of the park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 576, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...ide some residential areas that are now exist, there will be a new one on the right o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54042553191 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58528061754 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506382978723 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4039367028 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.7 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109798574656 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557312298196 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680699529952 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981451373117 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0837926660316 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.