The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps depict the heart of a little town named Islip, currently and ideas for its renovation. From an overall perspective, the plans focus on developing the infrastructure of the town mainly enhancing the roads connecting it.

Proceeding to a more detailed observation, it can be noted that, the main road will instead be turned in to a specialised area for walkers. However, stores located south of the main road will remain unchanged. But, on the opposite side of the road, the shops and the country side will be demolished and further be replaced by a bus station, a shopping mall, a parking and a new housing area, in which will have a specialised subsidiary route derived from the updated road knot.

In addition, the park will be slightly narrower, giving space for the built up of the dual carriageway that will take place. Nevertheless, a new residential area, west of the park, right beside the existing one will be constructed, making them three places of accommodation on the southern side of the town. It can also be seen that enhancements on the building of the town’s school are very minor.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ute derived from the updated road knot. In addition, the park will be slightly n...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, nevertheless, so, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86387434555 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87361590602 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61780104712 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3968107006 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112059812416 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626306116143 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563792753785 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099727923052 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801070610976 0.0819641961636 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.