The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day.
The given maps detail developments of a ground floor of an art gallery between 2005 and the present day.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that most of the features have been altered, except for the entrance and the three exhibition rooms. The main changes involve the replacement and the emergence of new facilities, making the gallery become more modern.
The left area of the gallery has witnessed a significant change. In the northwest, a gallery shop has been erected on the site of the original café. People have also pulled down the gallery office and put a vending machine there instead. Exhibition room 4 in the lower-left corner has undergone a separation into a temporary exhibition room and an area for children.
Turning to the central, a few improvements have been made. The receptionist area has been transferred from its previous location which was right next to the old gallery office to the center of the ground floor. Nowadays, the gallery has been more well-equipped with the appearance of a new lift between the stairs and the exhibition room 3. Furthermore, a ramp for wheelchairs has been built near the entrance, which has enabled disabled travelers to enter the floor space.
Regarding the right side of the gallery, the layout of the three rooms has been remained similar.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, regarding, so, well, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75331837328 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556561085973 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8956518578 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0833333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216412988904 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816520342312 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133706923206 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146772694899 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.182984693891 0.0819641961636 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.