The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
The pictures depict a number of important changes which took place in a town after being constructed a hydroelectric power dam over the course of 10 years starting in 1990.
From the maps, the town has undergone significant changes. The most noticeable change that occurred in the town was that of a huge lake. This infrastructure change has taken place at the expense of forest, ancient structure and farmlands.
In 1990, there was an ancient structure and a forest with rare flora and fauna to the west of the river, and irrigated farmlands to the east. However, with the construction of a dam wall, those features disappeared beneath a large lake, which also became a fishing areain2010.
Looking at the maps in more detail, while the mountains still existed, the villages in the far east were relocated further south of the mountains, and a large hotel was built in their place. Meanwhile, a hydroelectric power dam was constructed with a wide range of electricity pylons appearing nearby.
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 47
- The table below presents the food consumption per a person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Men and women employed in full time jobs have to share evenly household chores and caring for children at home Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 56
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... villages in the far east were relocated further south of the mountains, and a la...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98203592814 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84770676632 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5205832509 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292621990818 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114458051699 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10209489751 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169963467353 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993697590112 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.