Some people say that history can teach us many important values and lessons, but others think it is unnecessary to learn from the past. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are many considerable debates about the values of studying history. While it is believed that there is no advantages of learning what happened in the past, some argue that history must also does teach a lot of previous lessons. I agree with the latter view.
It is understandable why people think it is pointless to learn from the past. History is the field that requires us to remember names, dates and facts which have little use in our everyday life, and it seems plain that they get stressful and overloaded with history-related knowledge in several cases. However, this thought may have an adverse effect on students. Because history depicts the mistakes made in the past, hence helping people to avoid similar ones in the future. The implication of this is that the country may not develop.
Instead of the aforementioned approach, I am convinced that history should become a more previous informative source. History helps young people have thorough insights into their own culture and how their country has evolved. Viet Nam perfectly exemplifies this situation. The youth need to understand how their ancestors defended the nation against intruders throughout many dynasties and maintain a sovereign and free country, which would develop their patriotism and pride.
In conclusion, while there could be many reasons to support giving up history, I believe it would be more benefical for people to study from past events as a huge knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no advantages'?
Suggestion: there are no advantages
...ying history. While it is believed that there is no advantages of learning what happened in the past, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 157, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'huge knowledge'.
Suggestion: huge knowledge
...for people to study from past events as a huge knowledge.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13865546218 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70416264054 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.659663865546 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3932835443 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0769230769 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227328015 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704618419596 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063732136095 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12754438359 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428873366138 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.