The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The pictures illustrate a number of significant changes which took place in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam.
From the map, it is clear that the most noticeable change that occurred in the town was the huge lake. Moreover, irrigated farmlands and forests disappeared in 2010.
In 1990, there were irrigated farmlands to the east, and an ancient structure and rare plants and animals on the west side of the river. However, with the construction of a dam wall, those features disappeared and became a huge lake in the middle of 2010.
Looking at the maps in more detail, there were no forests in the north west, whereas there were more mountains in 2010. Meanwhile, the south was filled with mountains that had been replaced by electric dams. The river was shortened and the surrounding villages were shortened. A total of 8 power poles were installed around the river in 2010, increasing the number of poles to eight.
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000
- Some people think that mental strength is the most important factor for success in sports However some others believe that it is more important to have strong and fit people Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstruction of a hydroelectric power dam. From the map, it is clear that the most ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmlands and forests disappeared in 2010. In 1990, there were irrigated farmlands ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95061728395 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76388845807 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586419753086 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3121133804 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220892115456 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882986449167 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146450333652 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166434628461 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153868460127 0.0819641961636 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.