The maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The supplied layout compares the earlier and current appearance of island after the construction of tourist facilities.
Overall, it is evident that all the construction have made without causing any harm to the nature that is; without cutting trees.
Now, turning to detail of earlier appearance of island, the centre of island was vacant, having some trees on the eastern and western side of the island. Moreover, a beach was also available on the Western side. Notwithstanding such facilities, it was not suitable for tourism. Therefore, many tourist facilities have constructed to make the island suitable for tourism.
First of all, a pier is constructed so that tourists can visit the island by the means of water transport like boats. Moreover, at the centre of the island reception is built, which is connected to the restaurant and to pier through vehicle track. In addition to this, accommodations on the East and West side of reception are connected to each other as well as to the beach through footpath. At the beach, facility of swimming is also made available so that tourist can enjoy swimming as well at the island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to each other as well as to the beach through footpath. At the beach, facility...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, in addition, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04232804233 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78878644969 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1079723661 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235672831661 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965188496748 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867300113118 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155098305472 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951156278025 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.