The maps provide complete information about how the town named langle changed form the year 1910 to 1950
Overall, it can be manifest from the maps that town has changed mostly from all the parts, but majority of the changes were in north and south area of the town.
To begin with, in 1910, there were cottages of railway workers in south direction of the langle town, which had been demolished and at that place children play area was buit in 1950. Secondly, in center of the park there were many houses in 1910, while in 1950 all of these houses had been demolished and a new park name sherman park was created their. Thirdly, in 1910, there was a factory in the north direction of a town and a shop in the central part of the langle town, both of these had been removed and at that place a new big sherman mansion was built in 1950.
Additionaly, in 1910, there were many houses in the straight line starting from north-east and line ends in south-east, all of them had been demolished and at that place three big bulildings were constructed in 1950. Lastly, there was a cafe and laundry in the central weat direction of the town in 1910, while in 1950 both of them had been shifted to the north-west corner of the town, and three new stores were built in the south-west corner of the town.
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 11
- As we are facing many problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43333333333 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21992242107 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.420833333333 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.1432077841 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.333333333 112.824112599 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 5.23603664747 239% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250347965329 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147244454375 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610083330002 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181827413064 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480465224368 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.26 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.01 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.