The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950.
The given maps compare the layout of Langley town as described for two different periods 1910, and 1950.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the entire town underwent dramatic changes resulting in improved infrastructure, well-planned design, and renovated public facilities, however, the layout plan remained unchanged.
According to the given illustration, in 1910, the majority of the plan was covered with row and townhouses at the middle and western end of the map, accompanied by a factory, a few facilities, a railway track to the South, and wastelands to the North, and South directions separated by Sherman and Jordon roads. However, over time, the factory to the North and the houses to either side of Sherman road has been demolished to develop a Sherman Mansion. Also, the laundry and cafe to the opposite ends of the Sherman road have been relocated to the place of the wasteland.
Furthermore, to the South of Sherman road, whilst a spacious children's park has been built to replace another wasteland, the adjoining railway cottages and a store to the North have been destroyed to reconstruct three stores to the other end of a new lane, which opens up in the Sherman street. Moving on, the townhouses and an open park to the right of the Jordon street have been replaced by three big flats to the Western end of the map, and also the street has been connected with the Sherman street by demolishing the houses to the other end. Further, the railway track also has been removed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 599, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he railway track also has been removed.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 965.302439024 135% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94318181818 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69424178945 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 94.270803407 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.125 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1113314527 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063490524657 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117101231692 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116569212286 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144616902605 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.