The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate the changes that have taken place in the village of Stokeford between 1930 and 2010.
Overall, the housing areas were expanded and restructured along the main road, while the lands for agricultural activities vanished.
In 1930, Stokeford consisted of two farmlands in the southwest and the northeast; a post office, a primary school and shops, as well as gardens together with a large house in the southeast. The main road connected these facilities and separated Stokeford into two sides.
By 2010, regarding the accommodation systems, plantation, gardens, and shops had been demolished to make way for new blocks of flats on the eastern and southern banks of the river. More streets were erected in terms of the transport network, branching off the major road to provide access to newly-built houses. Those were also lengthened along the leading road and parallel to the Stock River. Meanwhile, the large house had been broadened and converted into a retirement home. In close proximity to the nursing home, the grade school’s size had doubled throughout the period surveyed. Moreover, the mail depot directly opposite the elementary school remained intact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 484, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...nd converted into a retirement home. In close proximity to the nursing home, the grade school’s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the elementary school remained intact.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35106382979 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72851083739 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654255319149 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5045451863 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12164286234 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461983059296 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674058293647 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949852228095 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808426032102 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.