The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps depict the development in the village of stokeford from 1930 to 2010. Overall, it is obvious that infrastructure is developed and the livestock which used to be in the southern part and the northeastern part are not to be found.
The development of the city is clearly seen from the increase in the number of houses and the construction of new roads. Farmlands in the southern and northeastern are replaced with new houses and roads. Moreover, the large house with a large garden is renovated. The large house is renovated into a retirement home and the garden is used for residence. New homes and roads were built in the area west of the retirement homes and it was fully residential.
The primary school in the 1930s is small however, few buildings are added to the primary school in 2010. The shops which were present in 1930 were removed for the construction of new roads and houses. But the
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ruction of new roads and houses. But the
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67080745342 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71112142687 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 77.0 106.607317073 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2076605016 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5555555556 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0707661996568 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032644666364 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768585845637 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589067611072 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532110490883 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.