The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps indicate several significant changes in Stokeford village during a period
of 80 years.
Overall, it is noticeable that the the number of houses increased dramatically, while
the lands for agricultural purposes vanished.
In 1930, there were a few houses on both sides of the only road which ran through
the middle of the village of Stokeford. By 2010, the local shops had disappeared
and only the Post Office remained. (*) The two areas of farmland to the north-east
and south-west of the village were converted into residential areas. Over the same
period, more streets were built, leading off the main road to give access to
additional housing. Housing was also extended along the main road.
In addition, the local primary school opposite the Post Office was enlarged with 2
new blocks. Gardens formed the centre of the village in 1930, but by 2010 more
houses had been built on this site and the large house within the grounds was
extended to become a retirement home.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... years. Overall, it is noticeable that the the number of houses increased dramatically...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... years. Overall, it is noticeable that the the number of houses increased dramatically...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03614457831 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54216830104 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1939221417 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8888888889 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132893860321 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527429121509 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415992821312 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455552005046 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566853328217 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.