The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the maps provided reveals some significant changes in an island after the investment for tourism purpose.
It is noticeable that before the innovation, there were only a few trees in the north-east and south-west corner, but after constructing, there was a huge change in the number of accommodation in the island.
There were more and more houses were built in the middle of the island and foot paths were created around the residential areas for transportation. Additionally, the receptionist and the restaurant were built and divided the residential into two separate areas, leading to the construction of the vehicle track to the sea by a pier.
According to the construction of some tourist facilities, the transportation system had been developed with the appearance of a pier in the south and two more boats to give visitors chances to travel to the sea. The swimming area in the western edges of the island was permitted to access.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 804.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06208582597 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7251361095 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.23603664747 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173183853216 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810666399961 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495544229651 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105190364919 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451048836014 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.