The lne grph below shows the number of cel phone subscribers in a particular city
by gender
Summarize the infrmation b selectg and reporting the main features, and make
comparisons where relevant
A glance at the graph provided reveals some striking similarities between man and woman in using mobile phone for the period of 20 years in Marysville.
It is evidence from the graph that there was a common trend in the amount of described in terms of gender. Both of two groups witnessed the dramatically rising from 1995 to 2015.
In 1995, the number of cell phone's users experiences a rocket increasing from 500 people and reached the peak at the year of 2005. Despite the same rising, man-users are slightly less than women but until 2005, both two lines met at the same point in 2500 users.
After developing with the same speed, from 2005, the quantity of male describes was stable in 2500 until 5 years later while that of female was decreased at 2300 users at the same time.
By 2015, the amount of men users had been risen and reached nearly 2700 describer. However, only 2200 women used cell phone in Marysville at that time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'describer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'describers'.
Suggestion: describers
... had been risen and reached nearly 2700 describer. However, only 2200 women used cell pho...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 781.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64880952381 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29090896565 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.868166602 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.625 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0310541436412 0.215688989381 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0158867617918 0.103423049105 15% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222962170285 0.0843802449381 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0179435249932 0.15604864568 11% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015079445827 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.