The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The maps illustrate a number of changes which are predicted to take place in an office building in the future.
Overall, it can be obviously seen that the office is likely to witness radical changes with the most noticeable being the extension of the building. Furthermore, that change will be accompanied by the rearrangement and addition inside the office building.
Looking at details, the most striking transformation is that there will be expansion of building toward the south, replacing the current glass area. In the newly extended area, there is likely to be a coffee machine and WCs on the northeastern corner of the map, being across from the new meeting area with a myriad of chairs. Besides, the grass area to the southern side of the building is planned to be renovated into a new outdoor sitting area in the foreseeable future.
In addition, another major change is the front of the building. The entrance is currently in the south-eastern corner, which is forecasted to be relocated into the south side of the building. The four offices currently at the bottom side of the building will be incorporated into two larger offices lying on two side of the entrance. The kitchen and the canteen in the north side of the building will be converted into new offices, meanwhile the storeroom is predicted to stay unchanged.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 334, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ices lying on two side of the entrance. The kitchen and the canteen in the north si...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, look, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91592920354 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.788864025 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495575221239 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.332985346 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.1 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110953104006 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578393078991 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533841415642 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967785102395 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624650447102 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.