The maps show the changes in the plan of house in 2010 compared to 2020.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate alternatives taking place in the scheme of the house in 2010 in comparison to 2020.
Overall, the building has some changes in its interior space and its exterior space as well. However, some locations in place remained the same after the decade.
To begin with, the exterior space of the house, like the garden in the north, the entrances‘ location, and a study bedroom on the side of the entrance in the west side, stayed as they were in 2010. However, an extra study bedroom between the prior one and the entrance was added, almost the same size as the other one. Besides, parking, which was located in the southern part of the exterior area in 2020, was a garden back in 2010. It is noticeable from the maps that a living room on the west side, next to the prior garden, was eliminated in 2010.
On the other hand, in the interior area, the living room doubled in size in the northwest of the scheme, and the hall, got smaller, almost twice its size in sought west of the map. Although the kitchen had twice its size in 2020, it became a social area, either. An inside bathroom was built between the study room in the southwest, which remained the same. The bathroom’s location changed a little, and a study bedroom in the north changed its shape.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, well, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56277056277 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29974866284 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3668675933 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8181818182 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110023201118 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051344803928 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634994880934 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942503595556 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819566592108 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.