The maps show the Grange park as it is today and as it was a century earlier.
The two maps present Grange park in its current state and the old one more than 100 years earlier.
Overall, the park space has been renovated to become considerably more entertaining, offering an enhanced amphitheatre for concerts, a cafe, so as a children’s play area. It has also improved logistically due to an extra entrance from the newly added car park that leads to yet another addition - a water feature.
Previously, the park consisted of the fountain, located between the entrances from Arnold avenue and Eldon street, with a stage for musicians to the left. This performance spot was surrounded by the four seat areas alternating with the two rose gardens. Adding more greenery to the site, the pond for water plants cornered the opposite side of the park, adjoining to the third garden for roses. On the right from the Eldon street enter point, there was a glasshouse and the fifth set of seats.
Presently, only the two main entries, streets’ names and one out of three spaces for flowers remained unaltered. The current set-up includes the aqua feature that replaced the old house made from glass. Adjacently positioned, there is an underground parking entrance that was created at the expense of the seating facilities. Additionally, the water plants pond was removed in favour of the playground for children, so as the third flower garden that was turned into a cafeteria. Nevertheless, the most notable change is the expansion of the music stage to become the amphitheatre for concerts. The fountain was taken out, while four of the seating spaces were rearranged and now frame the enlarged space with roses opposite to the performance scene.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grange) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
The two maps present Grange park in its current state and the old one mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0615942029 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72175352269 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2205032923 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164990618194 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581031760866 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584906377044 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117202541769 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656647592757 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Grange) must be used with a third-person verb: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
The two maps present Grange park in its current state and the old one mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0615942029 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72175352269 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 106.607317073 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601449275362 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2205032923 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.461538462 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164990618194 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581031760866 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584906377044 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117202541769 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656647592757 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.