Market share (in percentage) of different notebook manufacturers in 2006 and 2007.
The table gives information about the global market share of different laptop manufacturers in 2006 and 2007. Overall, it is clear that HP remained the highest in market share with a slight increase at the end of the period.
In 2006, nearly one-third of the market share was under HP. By 2007, it increased slightly and at that time, it had just over one-third of the market share. Dell had the second largest market share individually, at 16.6%. However, by 2007, it increased noticeably and then it had around one-fifth of the total market share.
Acer had about only one-tenth of the market share with a marginal decline in 2007. Both Toshiba and Lenovo had closely the same share, at around 6%, however, by 2007, Toshiba gained around 1% point while Lenovo’s share declined minimally. Fujitsu/Siemens experienced a decline of almost half percentage point, from 4.8% to 2.3%. Noticeably, nearly a quarter of the market share was gained by other manufacturers aggregately, however, it declined by around 3% point in 2007.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- People living in the 21st century are enjoying a better quality of life compared to people who lived in the previous centuries. To what extent do you agree or not? 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free?Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Some people become famous at the young age. Is it a good thing or a bad thing? 61
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0701754386 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79303290285 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3637942293 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407093772574 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186600885752 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100753607649 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297784610181 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567380678054 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.