Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favor of them because of their benefits to humanity.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Stances diverge on whether along with the breakthrough innovations to assist in modulation medicine, it is necessary to experiment on animals despite its ethical implications. Although some formidably censure that outlook, I am in agreement owing to some rational ideas.
Admittedly, from an ethical point of view, animal experiments are considered cruel and inhumane. To be accurate, people often abuse animals for experiments by forcing them to eat, offering living conditions of lack of food and water, or traumatizing to study the healing process. For example, a great number of guinea pigs used in behavioral experiments were subjected to abuse and mistreat during a course of a study which is considered morally wrong. Therefore, conducting experiments on animals should not be permitted.
In contrast, I ascertain that animal testing should be positively viewed in light of myriad upsides to humans. Perceptively, experimental research methods help and develop many distinct fields, especially the treatment of diseases before applying them on humans to ensure the safety of patients from the unwanted. Therefore, figuring out how it works, understanding human diseases and developing new treatments would on no account be achieved without the sacrifice of animals’ life. For example, an experiment to remove the pancreas in dogs helped detect insulin - the key factor in saving the lives of people with diabetes. Moreover, animals are the subject of research because they are similar to humans in several aspects and allow researchers to explore a range of medical conditions such as cancer and heart disease.
By way of conclusion, animal experiments are beneficial for scientific research notwithstanding the inhumanity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is necessary to experiment on animals despite its ethical implications. Althou...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'guineas'?
Suggestion: guineas
...process. For example, a great number of guinea pigs used in behavioral experiments wer...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 965.302439024 153% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5946969697 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08008682544 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643939393939 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 283.868780488 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4667018149 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312727922203 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113364785617 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623157331933 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167530592837 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663949214124 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 61.2550243902 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.29 8.06136585366 128% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 40.7170731707 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.