Nowadays, sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways. Is this a positive or negative development for sports?
It is true that many business companies invest to sports and this makes both companies and people who are professional sports players can have profits. Personally, this has positive and negative effects for sports.
First of all, there are a lot of advantages when big companies invest on sports. The first advantage is that it creates opportunities for sports players who are skillful at their type of sports such as football, basketball, and so on. As a result, these people become famous and have a lot of money through playing sports. For example, Ronaldo is the most famous football star that everybody knows in the world thanks to his football skills. Secondly, due to the social media, people nowadays want to entertain by watching sports through the TV's screen and this leads to many big companies begin to invest on sports to serve the community. Therefore, these companies can gain lots of money by recording sports events to show for people. Moreover, providing funds to sports, companies can find many talented players and train them properly so they can make profits for them.
On the other hand, there are still having some drawbacks when companies involve sports. The first disadvantage is that some companies control matches of the game for their own purposes. This makes players can not play like their best and must follow orders, which can destroy the value of sports. For instance, in football, few companies use money to set up scores to the team they want and this creates unfair between two teams. The second drawback is that people who really good at sports, when working with big companies, they will suffer huge stress and problems and they also need to train harder if they do not want to get fired.
In conclusion, sports become more and more famous thanks to nig companies and professional sports players. This creates opportunities for them. However, it also a challenge for them to overcome.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 5.60731707317 517% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 965.302439024 166% => OK
No of words: 325.0 196.424390244 165% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92615384615 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.73543355544 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46528560944 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 106.607317073 157% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513846153846 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 283.868780488 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 8.94146341463 190% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3761670901 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2352941176 5.23603664747 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382887386341 0.215688989381 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128100538667 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888196623299 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277528273893 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106253522354 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.