As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others, however, think that the user should cover the costs. Discuss both these views and give your opinion?
Due to the increasing amount of traffic on the road, more money is needed for transport infrastructure. While it can be beneficial if the government bear this financial burden, I think it is more sensible for road-users to cover the expenses.
On the one hand, there are good reasons why the government should responsible for spending on road improvements. Transport infrastructure is one of the vital public services, along with education and healthcare. It helps to boost the country's economy because it improves the movements of goods and people. For example, the dominant economic status of China is partly due to the strong railway networks that link every part of the country together and enable freights and commuters to travel faster. Moreover, only the government can manage such a crucial sector since it not only has the authority to fundraise through the tax system but is in the position to ensure the interest of the public as a whole.
On the other hand, it is more sensible to make road-users to pay for the transport systems. Firstly, road-users are those who directly benefit from the improvement of roads and the subsequently eased traffic congestion. They enjoy a better quality of life since their daily commute is less stressful and time-consuming. Secondly, road-users will be discouraged from driving if they are taxed to finance the improvement of roads, which leads to the reduction of exhaust fumes and green-house gas emissions. For example, by making fuel-driven the subject to the green tax, the authority is encouraging a switch to hybrid or electric cars, which are more sustainable and environmentally friendly forms of transportation.
In conclusion, I believe that road users should cover the costs related to road improvements.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1487.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1993006993 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04965868801 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 106.607317073 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587412587413 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 283.868780488 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9933591418 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.384615385 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 5.23603664747 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234368574423 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848588851363 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837660055573 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162031879745 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732255139399 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 40.7170731707 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.