Number of shop closures and openings 2011-2018
The line graphs display the number of store which was closed and opened during 2011 to 2018. Interestingly though, it is measured in thousand. At first glance, it was evident that both of graph are fluctuated. The highest decline of opening shops occured in 2011 to 2012 while the ended stores had a significant decrease in 2015.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to the data in 2011 to 2015, the closures of markets started more than 6000 and dropped slightly in 2012. However, it was growing about a thousand to 7000 during 2013 before fell drastically to 500 throughout 2015. Next, the establishment was drop dramatically, it was almost a half in 2012 from approximately 8500 to 4000 but rose steadily to 6000. Then, it was decreasing around a third to 4000.
Turning to the graph between 2015 to 2018, the opening markets were remain constant exactly in 4000 until the last of 2017 and dropped to 3000 along 2018. Finally, the shops which were closed rose sharply to 5000 and unchanged until the last year over the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...Interestingly though, it is measured in thousand. At first glance, it was evident that b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'remained'.
Suggestion: remained
... 2015 to 2018, the opening markets were remain constant exactly in 4000 until the last...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7679558011 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54166465466 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613259668508 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0318781592 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254757307185 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843549933905 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105295591167 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165120625768 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097115186932 0.0819641961636 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.