Overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph gives information about the number of foreign visitors who came to the coast, the mountains and the lakes in a European country from 1987 to 2007. In general, what stands out from the graph is that while the number of visitors to the coast and the mountains increased, there was a significant growth in that for the lakes which following by a decline in 2007.
In 1987, the figure of foreign visitors to the coast and mountains stood at 40,000 and 20,000 respectively. The number of visitors to the coast then went down slightly in 1992 before it saw a continuous increasing to 75,000 in 2007. That for the mountains had the similar trend to the coast. However, there were more fluctuations in the number of foreign visitors to mountains than that of visitors to the coast. In 2007, the number of visitors to the mountain ended at around 37,000, just two times more than its beginning.
The number of overseas visitors to the lakes started at 10,000 which was the lowest in comparison with the beginning of other areas. After 1987, this number rose dramatically and reach a peak of 75,000 in 2002, same with the figure of visitors to the coast in 2007. Despite this upward trend, the number of foreigners visiting the lakes slumped by 25,000 from 2002 to 2007.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6814159292 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4515191133 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46017699115 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8185139846 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195241673026 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093938178403 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572964474177 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147655626109 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253421249269 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.