The percentage of female members or parliaments in European countries (2000-2012).
The line graph compares the engagement of women in five European parliaments in percentage terms over a twelve-year period from 2000 to 2012
It is clear that the proportions of every nation expressed similarities in terms of the upward patterns with the exception of Belgium over the period. In addition, the United Kingdom’s figure overall remained lowest in every given year.
In 2000, the percentage of female representation in German was highest at 30% , followed by 27% of Italy and 25% of France. This growing pattern was set to continue until 2008 in which the reverse change could be seen in Italy’s figure, significantly climbing to 40% after having surpassed Germany’s between 2008 and 2012, which slightly increased to 36% in 2012. Despite notable changes in the two nations, France still came to third in comparison with Germany and Italy each year with the proportion eventually gradually growing by 7% from 2000 at the end of the time phase.
When it comes to women representation in parliaments in other nations, in 2000, the proportion of Belgium was above 15%, four times higher than that of the United Kingdom. Nonetheless, while the figure for Belgium nearly stagnated around 23% and 24% and finally dropped by 1.5% in 2012, women represented more in the UK parliaments as shown at the sextuple in the percentage, making the equivalence of 21.5% with Belgium’s.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 105, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...arities in terms of the upward patterns with the exception of Belgium over the period. In addition, t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...resentation in German was highest at 30% , followed by 27% of Italy and 25% of Fra...
^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he percentage, making the equivalence of 21.5% with Belgium's.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, nonetheless, so, still, third, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13973799127 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99233109275 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615720524017 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7883473758 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.142857143 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7142857143 22.9334400587 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203360796843 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866762395279 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622383710559 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129121777189 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100755079497 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.