Percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking?
The first pie chart highlight the information about food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking, and second linear graph raveals the data about fast food vs. sitdown restaurant meals. The both graph data is calibrated in percentum and number of meals.
It can be seen that, percentage of food budget spent on restaurant meals and home cooking. In the year 1970 home cooking had spent 90% food budget and restaurant meals spent 10 percentage budget. Moreover, during the year 1980 restaurant was spending as well as home cooking had been spending 85% budget. However in the year 2000 restaurant meals and home cooking had same proportion.
As far as, trend was concerned that the fast food and sitdown restaurant meals. Furthermore, fast food meals in the years : 1970 and 1980 number of meals in between 20 to 27, and during the year 1990 and 2000 number of meals had 60 to 90. While, restaurant meals in the years 1970 and 1980 was 20 and 30 number of meals. Apart of all this, during the years 1990 and 2000 had 55 and 90 number of meals.
Overall, it is evident that the fast food meals has been increasing year by year, and as well as restaurant meals slightly up number of meals year by year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e cooking had been spending 85% budget. However in the year 2000 restaurant meals and h...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 373, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'proportioned'.
Suggestion: proportioned
...taurant meals and home cooking had same proportion. As far as, trend was concerned that t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: APART_A_PART[2]
Message: Wrong collocation. Did you mean 'apart from'?
Suggestion: Apart from
...and 1980 was 20 and 30 number of meals. Apart of all this, during the years 1990 and 200...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60648148148 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32748549463 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416666666667 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.359839775 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9166666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.504996178623 0.215688989381 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235869852769 0.103423049105 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.209002133717 0.0843802449381 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328623717631 0.15604864568 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.215270389193 0.0819641961636 263% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.43 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.