THE PERCENTAGE OF PEOPLE WHO OWN THE DEVICES FROM 2010 TO 2025
The line graph given illustrates the information about the number of electronic devices were owned, namely smartphone, laptop, smartwatch, tablet over the course of 15 years from 2010 to 2025.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the laptop had a period of stability while the other figures show an upward trend in the number of owners at the same time.
As regards to possessing devices, the laptop was the most popular consumption in 2010, about 60%. Subsequently, there was a moderate fluctuation over the next five years, although it reached a peak of 70% in 2015. Furthermore, this number is predicted to decline significantly in 2025, about 58%. Meanwhile, the least popular of 2010 was Smartwatch, just only 1%. However, the Smartwatch ownership was witnessed a gradual growth during the period from 2010 to 2020. The forecast is that this device will boom twice two times in 2025, approximately 40%
As for the tablet's proportion, it stood at 20% of the number of owners before going up in 2020 by 40 % ( from 20% to 60%) over the next ten years. Nevertheless, this rate is predicted to fall in 2025, just over 55%. This was the same for the smartphone. This number saw a considerable rise in 2020 after It just ranked second of ownership in 2010, 79% and 39% respectively. By 2025, it is expected that this number will rocket to the highest rate of 88 owners.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 was Smartwatch, just only 1%. However, the Smartwatch ownership was witnessed a...
^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f owners before going up in 2020 by 40 % from 20% to 60% over the next ten years....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, while, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1144.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76666666667 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72081494653 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4959223755 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.23603664747 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177037026976 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664437705104 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470663357873 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115314769537 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056018156875 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.