Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares the proportion of British men, women and children who fulfilled the daily suggested intake of fruits and vegetables from 2002 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that women were the most likely to have eaten the recommended amount of fruits and vegetables in a day. By contrast, children were the least likely demographic to have done so.
In 2002, a quarter of women consumed their suggested intake of fruits and vegetables every day, compared to 22% for men and only 11% for children. Growth was seen in all three demographics 4 years later. The percentage of men successfully consuming the daily recommended amount rose by 4 percentage points, while a more dramatic growth of 7 percentage points was experienced by the figures for women and kids.
2010 observed a regression in the figures for all three demographics. The percentage for both men and children dropped slightly, recording 24% and 16% respectively. Meanwhile, the figures for women witnessed a steep fall of 6 percentage points, ending the period at 26%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 1615.20841683 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 173.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11560693642 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88808016683 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8106677964 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 7.06120827912 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18553252348 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755148655231 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659055793431 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118893514202 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.051574982625 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 78.4519038076 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.