The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is the diagram delineating the production of apparel from reused plastic bottles. It is perceptible that this is a linear process with multiple steps, which commences with collecting plastic bottles and ends with manufacturing clothes.
The process initiates when different sizes of empty plastic bottles are being assembled before being moved to the recycle factory by rubbish trucks. Subsequently, these bottles were then classified to take out the unqualified ones. With the aid of a slicing mechanism, the bottles are cut into pieces to be treated suitably. Thereafter, fragments of plastic bottles are sent to the washing machine to wash away all the dust and smell before being put outdoors for drying purposes within 10 hours. Afterwards, dried empty bottles are placed in a boiling room to liquefy them, followed by the straining step. In penultimate steps, after being weaved from fiber - the outcome of the previous step, fabric is the input product to manufacture clothes in the last stage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27329192547 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69136510363 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670807453416 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7099299169 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.125 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138993197542 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578107276906 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.025480523884 0.0843802449381 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108318902103 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00597004704382 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.