The pictures illustrate the changes in Shipsmouth between 1995 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The two pictures highlight the main changes in Shipsmouth between the year 1995 and 2010.
Overall, It can be seen that in 1995, Shipsmouth was a green city with a lot of trees. But in 2010, it had become urbanised with so many new high-rise buildings, transport facilities, shopping centre, sport facilities.
The striking change is that the city was pedestrianised in 2010, which meant that there were some ways for only walking-people. A factory, which is a concern of pollution because of its smoke was converted and replaced by a modern shopping centre. Another interesting development is that there was many trees in 1995 in the western north and the eastern south of the city, which was cut down and by 2010, apartment blocks and an airport had been constructed in their places.
If we look at houses in 1995, they were redeveloped to become skyscrapers. Likewise, a church was knocked down to make way for a pub. And it is interesting to note that the construction of a new station and a football stadium in empty lands of the city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is that the city was pedestrianised in 2010, which meant that there were some w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73626373626 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8400375539 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604395604396 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2147429846 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160045398934 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756721010875 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109142340082 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138472220588 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137583931075 0.0819641961636 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.