The pie chart and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The given pie chart and table in combination depicts the percentages of fish imported from different countries to the US and total value of it in three years 1988, 1992 and 2000. The value is presented in Billions of Dollars.
Overall, Canada was the highest rate of imported of fish as 60% whereas China was the lowest rate as only 13% in 1988. Also, the value of imports rose by almost double over the period.
As can be seen, the rate of imported fish from Canada played a vital role as more than a half of total percentages while other countries rate of imported fish are 27%. However, China was the lowest rat of imported as 13%. The overall revenue was almost 7 Billions of Dollars in 1988. In 1992, the rate of imported fish has increased by 7% from China and by 21% from other countries while rate plummet by 24% from Canada. The profit has augmented approx 2 Billions of Dollars from 1988 to 1992.
In 2000, the rate of imported declined from 34% to 28% from Canada but the rate climbed for China and other countries as 20% to 30% and 42% to 46% respectively. Also, the revenue has increased and reached almost 11 Billions of Dollars. This represents a huge increase of value from 1988 to 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '7 billion'.
Suggestion: 7 billion
... as 13%. The overall revenue was almost 7 Billions of Dollars in 1988. In 1992, the rate of i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 billion'.
Suggestion: 2 billion
...Canada. The profit has augmented approx 2 Billions of Dollars from 1988 to 1992. In 2000, th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 212, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '11 billion'.
Suggestion: 11 billion
...evenue has increased and reached almost 11 Billions of Dollars. This represents a huge increas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46153846154 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32661041637 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2536741664 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242149956985 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10377821452 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101661573329 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191878642252 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118828561891 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.