The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990 Causes of land degradation by region

The chart demonstrates what affected the productivity of agricultural land poorly. The table presents the influence of these reasons on three regions of the world during the 1990s.
There are three major issues behind worldwide land degradation, and these are over-grazing, deforestation and over-cultivation. Over 30 per cent of land is degraded because of over-grazing, exactly 30 per cent is deteriorated due to deforestation, and more than a quarter of degraded land is caused by over-cultivation.
Europe had the biggest amount of deteriorated land compared to the other two regions. Most of the degraded land in Europe was caused by deforestation. The land of North America was deteriorated the least, and only 5 per cent of its land was degraded. The most major cause there was over-cultivation, and, unlike Europe, less than one per cent of North American land had suffered from deforestation. Oceania had 13 per cent of degraded land, however, in comparison to other regions, most of its land was deteriorated by one issue, over-grazing.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 205, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'cent' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'cents'.
Suggestion: cents
...because of over-grazing, exactly 30 per cent is deteriorated due to deforestation, a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29341317365 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46403950942 2.65546596893 130% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520958083832 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9398484283 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.22222222222 5.23603664747 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268576711611 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143081870366 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072848064781 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230527778099 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119495266076 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.