The pie chart below show the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990.Causes of land degradation by region
The pictorial layout illustrates the main cause of worldwide land degradation however, the tabular chart represents how these factors affected the land of three countries in 1990.
Having a look on the cause of overgrazing 35% land was less productive by to this while, the second place was deforestation, it was 5% lesser than the former reason.It has followed by the overcultivation , this was almost same with the deforestation about 28%.
Moving to the other chart into consideration, in Europe 9.8% land demolished due to the cutting of trees as well as over-cultivation and overgrazing was 7.7, 5.5 respectively. Oceania has the total degradation of 13% and this was 10% lesser than the Europe over-cultivation was a negligible reason in Oceania however, total land affected in North America about one in twenty.Other reasons such as, Over-cultivation 3.3% and overgrazing was 5.5%.
Overall, the main cause of land degradation was overgrazing and Europe badly affected by different reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...it was 5% lesser than the former reason.It has followed by the overcultivation , t...
^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n.It has followed by the overcultivation , this was almost same with the deforesta...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Other
...ed in North America about one in twenty.Other reasons such as, Over-cultivation 3.3% ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, second, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36942675159 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36307103037 2.65546596893 127% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0932608534 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.6 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 5.23603664747 241% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226002145923 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157427480085 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107319190537 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182887485291 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106255278521 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.2329268293 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.46 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.4329268293 179% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.