The Charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.
The pie charts illustrate different causes for cycling to work as well as for driving to work. The data calibrated in percentage.
Have a look on the reasons for cycling to work, due to the health and fitness 30% people choosing cycle whereas, the another reason is less pollution is similar with former.Moreover, no parking problems and no costs these are lie between one in twenty and just above one in ten percent. Afterwards, the last reason, faster than driving which stagnant on 12%.
By having a glance on reasons for travelling by car, the 40% proportion of persons selected car because its comfort on the other hand, near around a fifth lesser than people preferred car for distance to works as compare to the comfort one. In case of, faster than cycling and need to carry to work these kept on 14%. In next, 11% people take this because its safer than cycling.
Overall, most of the people selected cycle for the purpose of health and fitness however,the opposite side choosing for comfort.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cycle'
Suggestion: to cycle
... health and fitness 30% people choosing cycle whereas, the another reason is less pol...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 174, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...s less pollution is similar with former.Moreover, no parking problems and no costs these...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
...he purpose of health and fitness however,the opposite side choosing for comfort.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 830.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77011494253 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48887072262 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.9981617448 43.030603864 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.75 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216201374728 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833521093344 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657165321513 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122058577859 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586124483003 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.