The charts below shows the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The give graphs compare the reason for people travels to work by bicycle or by car. It is measured by percentage.
overall, it can be seen that the most reason for cycling to work is health or fitness and less pollution, while comfort is the most popular in people who drive to work.
Look more closely at why people cycling to work, health or fitness account for 30% of the total reasons, and the figures for less pollution are similar, with 30%. About 15% of the people say that no parking problems, while the reason for no costs and faster than driving is significantly lower, with 13% and 12% respectively.
On the other hand, in people driving to work, 40% of people feel comfortable to drive to work, this percentage is almost twice as those as the distance to work. The smallest proportion of driving to work is safer than cycling, accounting for 11%. The rates are equal at 14% faster than cycling and need to carry things to work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...y car. It is measured by percentage. overall, it can be seen that the most reason fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cling and need to carry things to work.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58235294118 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36950785482 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7328802202 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.375 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175004823819 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086987482092 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808075715731 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134101696253 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647154166902 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.