The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given pie graphs compare the proportion of water use in Sydney by five different fields in both 1997 and 2007
Overall, it is evident that the use of water in the household, as well as the service industry, has increased significantly in 2007 when compared with 1997, whereas, those figures for other sectors have fallen.
According to the graphs show, the majority of the water was used in the food industry, reaching the highest rates of 48% in 1997, but then dropped by 7 percent in 2007. With the service industry, however, water used was lowest in 1997, before experiencing the fastest growth by 2007, at least twice as high as those for this.
On the other hand, there was a dramatic decrease in both the building industry and manufacturing over the period show. These percentages were 5 and 15 percent respectively in 1997, after falling by 3 percent with the building industry and 4 percent with manufacturing by 2007. Household used water to account for 18 percent in 1997 and go went by 2 percent at the same time
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, then, well, whereas, at least, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69613259669 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60518181988 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.6817480792 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.666666667 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213144965786 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108204500774 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572229488174 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147995035958 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041363188601 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.