The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The first chart explains why some people choose bicycle to travel to work. Conversely, second chart illustrates some reasons why they prefer car to go to work.

Overall, people who prefer bicycles to work are mostly concerned about fitness, health and pollution. However, comfort is the main reason why people use car for travel during work. A little also consider car, as it is safer than cycling.

Health and fitness are one of the main reasons why people prefer cycle. Along with this 30% of the people also think about pollution and use bicycles. Next, 15% of the people consider No parking as the main reason while using cars. 13% think that cycling involves no costs and last 12% think that cycling is much faster than driving a car.

In contrast, comfort is the prime reason why 40% people drive. 21% of the people who work far from their home uses car. Faster than cycling and carrying things to work is the primary reason for 28% of people, 14% each respectively. Finally, 11% assume that driving is safer compared to cycling.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bicycle'
Suggestion: to bicycle
...t chart explains why some people choose bicycle to travel to work. Conversely, second c...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, however, second, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80662983425 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17657120867 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 17.6313330558 43.030603864 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.9230769231 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.9230769231 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30475990759 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123454060805 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899432239583 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213456124493 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067547630818 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.