The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given graph illustrate the export earnings in terms of four different items (namely petroleum products, engineered goods, gems and jewellery, agricultural products and textiles) in one country in 2015 compared with 2015. The given table illustrate the proportion of value changes in each sectors.
It is clear that there was an significant increase in export earnings from 2015 to 2016 in all fields excepting gems and jewellery. In addition, the value of one country's exports in both petroleum products and engineered goods were higher than for those in any other items.
Looking at the information in more details, over 60% of export earning in 2015 was petroleum products, accounting for the highest percentage of export earnings, and the percentage change of petroleum products from 2015 to 2016 increased slightly only 3%. By contrast, textiles was the lowest proportion of export earnings, but the percentage change of this fields was highest, more than five times those for petroleum products at the same time.
On the other hand, the second side of export earnings was engineered goods, with just under 60 billions dollars in 2015, and this figure changed considerably over the following year, rising almost 8,5%. gems and jewellery, however, the figures for the change rose to 8,5%. Finally, over 30% of export earnings in agricultural products was both 2015 and 2016, and the changes in this category was 0,81%
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...h sectors. It is clear that there was an significant increase in export earnings...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of petroleum products from 2015 to 2016 increased slightly only 3%. By contrast,...
^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... earnings, but the percentage change of this fields was highest, more than five time...
^^^^
Line 7, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... just under 60 billions dollars in 2015, and this figure changed considerably ove...
^^
Line 7, column 206, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Gems
...the following year, rising almost 8,5%. gems and jewellery, however, the figures for...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, second, well, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21304347826 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63178190442 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508695652174 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 345.6 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7453701939 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.222222222 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312113550956 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144285242377 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641563246807 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206610535484 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224449160774 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.