The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the export values of a country in a plenty of its industries between 2015 and 2016 whereas the below table indicates the proportion of changes in five exports in that period.
The bar chart shows one country's income made from many export items from 2015 to 2016. The highest value was petroleum products with about $60 billion in 2015 and then experienced a slight increase by $1 billion in 2016. Afterwards, the second highest earning was engineered goods with just above $55 billion in 2015 and rose significantly at the same level of petroleum products’ figure one year later. Three next industries ranked last in which textiles reached $25 billion in 2015 as the smallest value among five categories. Then, there was a substantial boom when the contribution of textiles climbed at half as high as that of the highest.
The table indicates the shares of these items during the survey. Although petroleum products comprised the biggest value for export earnings, it slightly increased at 3% throughout the study. Whereas the smallest value contributed to a dramatical surge in national exports at 15.24%. Following it, engineered goods was responsible for nearly half as high as that of textiles. The lowest change in this table was agricultural products with 0.81% in increase. The only down trend among five categories was gems and jewelry almost at 5.18%.
Overall, although petroleum products included the highest value in national exports, textiles contributing to the smallest earning experienced a significant rise in changes over the survey.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...om many export items from 2015 to 2016. The highest value was petroleum products wi...
^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd then experienced a slight increase by billion in 2016. Afterwards, the second ...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y increased at 3% throughout the study. Whereas the smallest value contributed to a dra...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24110671937 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79575474436 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533596837945 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.0322570629 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.30769230769 5.23603664747 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282421616691 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993571480789 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946193358684 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177590572933 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105208204065 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.