Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve situations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, in the context of competitive workings, it is widely believed that employees should face to negative circumstances through continuing working in current workplaces which do not consider promotions or suitable paying while another group thinks about trying their lucks in better places.
Advocates of this solution propose that it is highly unlikely to find a job in an integrated economy. Especially in the era of technologies, when artificial intelligence is willing to replace a variety of underdeveloped staff. For example, a myriad of progressive and automatic machines could be established in a plant to undertake difficult tasks, whereas workers are likely to get troubles to complete these tasks and might be fatally injured when working unsafe areas. As a result, employees recently have accepted working in bad conditions or even have not blamed for insufficient salaries.
On the other hand, other people believe that it does not deserve for what they did. Therefore, they choose to challenge themselves in other environments. Some people are eager to learn a wide range of new knowledge to keep track of the pace of decades' technologies. For instance, the young spend more time on studying with the dream of improving the world's development. Besides, they also hope to achieve well-paid occupations. Therefore, some enthusiastic applicants nowadays do not accept poor fates, they are always willing to explore new things and amazing opportunities.
Personally, I believe that modern times including difficult situations will open more chances for human beings to challenge themselves to get better jobs and well-paid positions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...tudying with the dream of improving the worlds development. Besides, they also hope to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50196078431 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03265325659 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0977646884 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.916666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140993957545 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461265611758 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326468680148 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0730157116819 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224832200535 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.