The table shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions from 1992 to 1998.

Essay topics:

The table shows the production of cocoa beans in six regions from 1992 to 1998.

The table illustrates the number of cocoa beans produced in six regions between 1992 and 1998. It is clear that Africa and South America were the two highest producers of cocoa beans over the six-year period. Furthermore, in 1994, there were only two areas manufacturing cocoa beans.

Africa had the highest production of cocoa beans over the six-year survey. To be more detailed, the figure increased significantly from 1992 to 1996 and decreased slowly at 1,843,000 tons in 1998. South America was the second-highest manufacturer in this survey, which also experienced a fluctuation from 1992 to 1998.

In contrast, Oceania and North and Central America were the two least producers of cocoa beans and they were only the two regions which made cocoa bean throughout the survey. The former had approximately 40,000 tons throughout the study whereas the latter had higher production than the former by 10,000 tons. Besides that, Caribbean and Asia rose gradually from 1992 to 1998 although they did not produce in 1994.

In conclusion, there were many regions over the world producing cocoa beans from 1992 to 1998 and Africa was the highest producer over the survey.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, in conclusion, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16230366492 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61400772285 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523560209424 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6656366862 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417418614551 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185306184816 0.103423049105 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126185801845 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281581115692 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476979065706 0.0819641961636 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.