The plans below whos a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictures illustrate how Grange park has changed since 1920 when it first was in use.
In 1920, there were three rose garden located around two entrances of the park. It was impressive that there was a wonderful fountain in the centre of the park which was to the right of the stage for musicians. Whenever the visitors enter this amusement park from Eldon Street, they could encounter a glasshouse to the right of the entrance, which was opposite of the pond for water plants. Besides that, this was an ideal place for many people to come and take a rest on seats sited around rose gardens and glasshouse.
Nowadays, the fountain is demolished and replaced by a rose garden surrounded by seats in four directions. The rose garden right up to the entrance from Amold Avenue is replaced by a coffee shop which is now near to the children’s play area instead of the old glasshouse and it is next to the new third entrance following the underground car parking. The last change is a bit glorious when a modern amphitheatre for concerts established instead of the simple stage for musicians.
Overall, Grange peak has significant developments to meet the requirements of contemporary citizens despite lacking of some beautiful natural features.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94811320755 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77863421788 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5526314909 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.555555556 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0973858319746 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483546106721 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558211853923 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729807436025 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639964661933 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.