The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts compare the average shares of particular meals in three kinds of nutrients that were surveyed in America. There are significant differences among sodium, saturated fat and added sugar, which may be not good for human’s health when consuming a large proportion.
In sodium, the most significant share of this agent is dinner which contains nearly half of this nutrient. The second highest proportion, 29%, is a mid-noon meal, while the contribution of breakfast is as high as that of snacks and just less than half of lunch’s consumption.
It seems to be similar to sodium when dinner accounts for just below 40% of spending saturated fat, which is the largest proportion among four meals. The lunch is responsible for 26% which is lower than using it in dinner by 10%. There is little difference between the shares of breakfast and snacks, as the former comprises 16% of saturated fat whereas the contribution of the latter is higher by a margin of 5%.
On the other hand, the most popular consumption in added sugar is snacks which contributes 42%. American people use almost half of snacks’ figure in their dinner. Indeed, lunch accounts for 19% of using added sugar and the proportion of breakfast is lower than that of lunch by a margin of 5%.
Overall, dinner is the most widely-used meal in both sodium and saturated fat, in contrast to added sugar which is included the most in snacks. Furthermore, American people consume breakfast as the least meal consisting of three kinds of nutrients.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99609375 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7563846339 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5078125 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8313396559 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.583333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994757295047 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0427326945533 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038138508754 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0656284989082 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429498436222 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.