The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,

and make comparisons where relevant.

The provided three pie charts represent an overview of average percentages of Sodium, Saturated fats and Added Sugars consumed by Americans in the four different meals in the USA.

Overall, the highest percentages of sodium and saturated fats used in the dinner, while the greatest sugar added in the snacks. In addition the lowest amount of all three types of nutrients used in the breakfast.

As the charts show, the amount of sodium is relatively higher in dinner than other meals which is 43%. Surprisingly, sugar and saturated fats were used by 23% and 37% respectively. In contrast, The lowest percentages of all three nutrients consumed in breakfast and it was 14%, 16% and 16% in sodium, saturated fats and added sugar respectively.

Furthermore, 42% of sugar consumed in snack’s meal; Whereas, 14% of sodium and 21% of saturated fats used in snacks. Meanwhile, sodium, saturated fats and added sugar consumed by 29%, 26% and 19% respectively in the lunch.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
... greatest sugar added in the snacks. In addition the lowest amount of all three types of...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85557979008 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46875 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 240.3 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8394647564 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102920365706 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581198194095 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486048806878 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0794369967356 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387613373607 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.