The plans below shoq a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first map illustrates the architectural composition of Grange park in 1920 while the second map represents it in the present time.
Overall, a substantial amount of changes have been made in the park over the years which include a newly constructed rose garden, an introduction of children's play area, a cafe and a parking spot.
The new rose garden at the center of the new park has replaced the old fountain. In addition to it, a new cafe is constructed near the old pond, which is also transformed into a dedicated area only for children. Now, there is a water monument in the place of glass house, which no longer exist.
Moreover, some existing elements of the park has been reconstructed, such as, stage for musicians has been modernized to an amphitheatre, whereas, the seating arrangements are now located around the rose garden. More to that, there is a new under ground car parking area used by the visitors.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, second, so, whereas, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84604989415 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63125 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0402002427 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 5.23603664747 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115098299321 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543126126669 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401629610209 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076855253266 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304805386819 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.